User talk:Frazzydee

Please sign your name with four tildes (like this: ~~~~). Also, make sure you post to the bottom of the page, so that everything is in chronological order.

(Archives: 1^*, 2^*)

---

Can you please help ?

Hi Faaraz! I found you through Wikipedia: WikiProject Fact and Reference Check. I was wondering if you'd mind lending me a helping hand with International Institute of Management article . On August 10 an unknown person (no signature) marked it for deletion. Then —Ben FrantzDale conducted a good faith google search for “international institute of management” and it did not return a top result. – Which led him to support the deletion marking. Two other users followed saying that the website was not notable and the institute claims non-verifiable international connections. However, I have conducted a detailed research on IIM website, including IIM research section, press-releases, events and photos, as well as other independent websites and provided evidence of notability and verifiable references. However, my concern is that I’m only one vote against 4 vote and I do not know if any of them will change their mind (human nature!). Therefore, I kindly ask you to verify the links provided in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/International_Institute_of_Management and help verify the notability. I’m not asking for anything less than an ethical vote. I’m willing to return the favor and review a similar article.Miro.gal

VfD votes in the Template namespace

I've been deleting VfD votes out of the template namespace... I saw back in April, you said to hold off on this... but since seem to be any problems, I'm going ahead and deleting them. --AllyUnion (talk) 08:58, 13 October 2005 (UTC)I do not know how to uswe this site, and my stupid friend just edited the topic and got me in trouble. I told him to stop but he wouldn't (i do not know how to contact you??)

Links to archive 2(?)

Looks like you've forgotten to add links to the second(?) archive: 2^bak. -- Paddu 21:49, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

that is indeed clever

i saw the ellipses, i just couldn't for the life of me imagine how you could express them as a single equation. thanks!--Etaonish 06:11, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians by D&D alignment page as being associated with the Lawful Good alignment. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians by D&D Alignment for instructions. --Cooksey 16:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Your vfd

Hello I know you nominated the Pasig City stampede page for deletion but might have forgot that is a current event in which many people died and hundreds got injured so read my reasons for why it can't be merged on the vfd page. Articles on the main page shouldn't be nominated for deletion but you might have not heard about it in the news. It's in the headlines of almost all Canadian tv now too. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 22:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the message Frazzydee. It's fine and yes you are allowed to nominate main page articles. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 20:05, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[no title]

Fuck you you fucking piece of shit.

65.13.148.223 20:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC) boss playa

hey: [[Image:Example.jpg]][[Media:Example.ogg]]<math>Insert formula here</math><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>--65.13.148.223 20:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

---

--65.13.148.223 20:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Insert non-formatted text here$Insertformulahere$[[Media:Example.ogg]][[Image:Example.jpg]]

Headline text

[[Image:Example.jpg]][[Media:Example.ogg]]<math>Insert formula here</math><math>Insert formula here</math>[[Image:Example.jpg]]<math>Insert formula here</math><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>--65.13.148.223 20:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)$Insertformulahere$[[Media:Example.ogg]][[Image:Example.jpg]][[Image:Example.jpg]][[Media:Example.ogg]][[Media:Example.ogg]]<math>Insert formula here</math><math>Insert formula here</math><nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here </nowiki> If you don't let me post, I will fuck you up

Note: This edit by the same user was reverted. These edits had to be reconstructed, as they were reverted without my permission. See the following diffs for original posts: [1][2][3][4]. I also added the nowiki tags.

Main page redesign

Yeah, it doesn't look good does it? What is everyone thinking? We can only hope that 22% opposition is enough to make them reconsider. Piet 08:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Indefinite block of Bar-Ilan

Thanks for contacting me. As you've noted, this form of severe vandalism and reverse denial of service has gone on long enough, and it is high time we escalate this to the IT department at Bar-Ilan. Unfortunately, the only hope of shutting this vandal down is by escalating the problem so that it gets noticed by a faculty member or good faith contributor. They wanted attention, and now they've got it. If you have any further questions regarding this, please do not hesitate to contact me on my talk page or via email. Best regards, Hall Monitor 17:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

What happened??

I have been informed by wikipedia that someone at my IP address (my ***hole step-brother robert) had been vandalizing the site in general, your page, etc.

I hadden't realized he was with wikipedia let alone vandalizing it, if anyone has any info on it him, whatever please message me on yahoo at Nmjc666@yahoo.com
thank you

Nmjc666

Bar-Ilan vandal

Anything you could add to the investigation of this vandal? See: user:woggly/Bar-Ilan_vandal --woggly 08:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs WCWM Marapets The Electric Playground Mr. Saturday Night Fresh Gear Brendan Moran Bacillus anthracis Chi-Lan Lieu Places in the Heart Sands of Iwo Jima Anime Unleashed Yoshi DeHerrera The Kids Will Have Their Say G-Phoria The Simple Life G4tv.com The Verdict Rock Against Bush Endemic birds of eastern North America

Cleanup List of British pop musicians of the 1930s List of references in Neopets List of British pop musicians of the 1940s Merge The chicken or the egg Ballot Gangrene Add Sources Alex Rodriguez Victoria School James Franco Wikify Brazilian Army Constructivist epistemology Marcin Expand Border Campaign (IRA) Joest Racing E!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 00:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Viruses

Hi! Just letting you know that it's (hopefully) back in action -- Serephine ♠ talk - 07:54, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Spoiler templates deletion/hiding

Since your comment on spoilers is quoted on the guideline Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates, I thought you might be interested in a current request for comment about spoilers, with a structured discussion page: Wikipedia:Spoiler warning/RfC --GunnarRene 06:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Help!!!

Can someone help me with the disadvantage of laser machining. Ive tried any one that was posted on the pages for laser machining and nothing came of it so far. <(^_^)>

b:WB:RFA

Hello Frazzydee. I wanted to inform you that we have created a new policy at en.wikibooks that asks all admins who have been inactive for a year or more to give up their admin privledges. This is not a punishment of any sort, so I hope you don't take offense to this. The idea behind this policy is that people who are not using the tools could kindly return them. If you have any questions about this, please let me know on my wikibooks talk page: b:User talk:Whiteknight. --User:Wknight8111 (WB:Whiteknight) 17:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, regarding Template:Uncyclopedia

I'm here to ask if you were behind its deletion, and if so, why? I am the original creator of the template, and no one complained at the time when I asked if I could create it. I think it brings "interwikiness" among articles, as well as showing the fun side of things, after all Wp is considered by many to be too "dry", and a link at the bottom of articles showing alternative versions for parody reasons would in my opinion improve the Wikipedia experience, as well as prevent some vandalism by "smart-asses".

I thereby ask that that template may be recreated again. It took me a lot of work to create it and I have to confess, I was bold in doing so, but that's what people expect from editors, is it not?

I can't figure very well the deletion log, so I'm not even sure if it was you who deleted it originally. If not, could you please inform the original admin of my position? Or if you point me in the right track, I'll do it myself.--Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves/Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} 09:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks!

Hi, Frazzy - great to hear from you! I'm glad to be able to help. :) Really, I have my hands very full already as the coordinator of the Molecular and Cellular Biology Project, but a few of us over there were thinking that it would be a shame to see a project with such potential languish, so I decided to put some effort into getting it back up. If you have any time, I could really use some help, even if it's just tagging articles with a {{Wikiproject Viruses}} template. Cheers! – ClockworkSoul 06:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Article Referencing Drive

Hello! Spacecraft propulsion is now the current Article Referencing Drive. Let's get working! —this is messedrocker (talk) 21:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Carole James.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carole James.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 03:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

;)

I read your userpage ;) Chris5897 (T@£k) 16:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[deleted edit]

Subject of a discussion changed to "hahaha"[5]

re Daily-article-l

Sure, I'd love to assist. Unfortunately, there is no proper way to extract data from a webpage without anchors to determine where the data is. In cases where changes often occur, It is best to manually approve the actions of a program. So, given this, I'd still like to help you. Please provide details to me via email, IRC, or my talk page. -- Jmax- 20:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

It would be very easy to automate this process, as the SMTP protocol is quite simple, and there are quite a few Perl modules for this purpose. Go ahead and email me the source of the script, and I'll see what I can do. -- Jmax- 06:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

(Un)fortunately, Java is just greek to me. If you have any specific regex or implementation questions please let me know, but I'm afraid I won't be able to assist you in debugging this script. -- Jmax- 21:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Date in subject.

Please add the date again. With the recent delays and skips it's hard to known what the "Today's selected anniversaries" are for. Thanks. -- Jeandré, 2007-09-23t08:28z

Re [6]: , and thanks also for the list - OTRS hears about it if people can't get their fix so it's an important morning ritual for many. -- Jeandré, 2007-09-28t22:06z

Quote of the day missing

the last week or so. -- Jeandré, 2007-11-12t19:09z

Che-Lives

It seems the Che-Lives page has been deleted, my internet access has been down for a while, so I didn't notice whatever process it went through. What do I need to do to get it brought back? If it was just a tag that led to deletion, then I can probably identify the vandal (who had placed the tag several times). Could you look into it for me please?--[[User:Che y Marijuana|Che y Marijuana]] 03:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bookmooch logo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bookmooch logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Isaac Roberts

Hi, an article you wrote a long time ago "Roberts's exact birth date is disputed, and different biographies about him specify different dates." But looking at the url you give in this article ([7] section Obituary of Isaac Roberts) all bio except the one from the Proceedings of the Royal Society give January 27 as birth date. I found a scan of the proceedings and the date is really 27 not 17 as stated in the transcription of the RS obituary, unless there is other independant source which gave 17, it look like a transcription error rather a disputed date. phe 04:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Parapoxvirus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parapoxvirus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Frazzydee button01.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Frazzydee button01.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Ref2

Template:Ref2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jack · talk · 18:56, Thursday, 6 September 2007

Image source problem with Image:Wikipedia-banner0002.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikipedia-banner0002.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 18:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Turing logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Turing logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  —Mike.lifeguard|^@en.wb 23:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

I have re-uploaded this image with a fair use rationale. -Frazzydee|✍ 21:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Photoret

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Photoret, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Photoret. Bearian (talk) 22:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Automating the daily FA

I've asked user:Cyde to look into automating the daily FA, to take the load off of you. He ran the daily FA script using the source code (here, for future reference) and the result was not pretty. How much of the daily email (like this) - if any - are you doing by hand? Raul654 (talk) 02:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

New School (Dawson)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article New School (Dawson), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jerzy•t 07:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Richard Farley.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Richard Farley.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 17:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Laura Black.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Laura Black.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazy Bones logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Bones logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

No problem, a goodly percentage of the ones that I tag as orphaned I fully expect ended up that way due to one type of vandalism or another :) Skier Dude (talk) 03:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Frazzydee! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 14 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Michael Voith - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry..I should have referenced at the time I wrote the article. Unfortunately I'm having trouble retracing my steps to find the sources I used, and many of the pages have since been taken down. I remember my main source being a biography on a government web site, but I cannot find that web site anymore. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm Not a Fan, But the Kids Like It!

I suspect that - because of the common references to indie rock bands and the amount of IP accounts - that the vandalism all came from one music forum or another, who were picking an easy target to create some sort "masterpiece" of bad humor. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 19:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

• One of the people involved - Kira-182!, the only one with a username - just sent me a message saying that s/he would link me to the thread where they planned everything (the only reason they sent it to me and not you is that I put a vandalism4 warning on most of the vandals' user talk. I do not trust this. I am pretty convinced that the whole thing was planned by 4chan's /mu/ board (due to the continuous referencing of it during the vandalism) anyway. If you so chose you contact Kira-182! yourself (I wouldn't know exactly what help it would be). Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 20:09, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Is there like anything we can do in this situation? I mean, they're pretty organized and stuff. In that thread, they have threatened you and have semi-threatened me. I mean, we can't block all of 4chan, can we? Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
    • Looks like they're doing it again (it's definitely them what with the continuous links to list of sexually active popes), but another admin has already locked the page again. I think it should remain locked for quite a while. At least they haven't come through on their threats to mass vandalise pages for The Antlers and Neutral Milk Hotel yet (why vandalize the page of something you like? It makes no sense. Then again, wiki vandalism itself makes no sense to me). Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
      • Check out the history for that album over the past couple hours. For instance, here's the difference between my last edit to remove remaining vandalism and the last edit before the article was locked (of course, there were other vandalisms which other editors removed before the lock). Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
        • I believe they selected Brokencyde and their album because they're a very easy target. The album is (deservedly) hated by critics and many music fans (it is one of the lowest rated albums on RateYourMusic, where it maintains a 0.83/5.00 average rating). There is no reason to vandalise a page which already includes fragments from negative professional reviews which are already very humorous (of course as I said before, there's no reason to vandalise Wikipedia period). Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Thought you should know.

Doc, is for a fact, right. Also, they are hitting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hospice_(album), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitchfork_Media#History, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stick_Stickly_%28song%29, and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Someday_Came_Suddenly with hardcore vandalism. at least with Attack! Attack!'s and The Antlers albums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kira-182! (talk • contribs) 20:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Camera Mapping

Thanks Frazzydee for cleaning up after me. Forgot that bit - and it's kinda useful... :-) Best wishes. --Haruth (talk) 22:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Where is my project page ?

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Um...Frazzydee is it? My project page was deleted shortly after i created a wiki account here on this website. I joined Wikipedia so i could make a small fun article about myself you know like how celebs do so, yeah i did that page out of fun. it was not bothering anyone by being there. i would like to know why my s*** was deleted when it was about me and when it was not harming anyone? i also realized you probably was only doing your job so i finna be cool with it and just make another page...no harm was really done 4 real. Chel0510 (talk)---Chel0510 10:48 am 5 April 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC).

User talk:174.3.123.220

You've been around WP a lot longer than me, so I'm a little reluctant to make this comment, but I'm troubled by your making fun off this newbie. It comes very close to a personal attack on a newbie. As I noted there, while changing {{otheruses4}} to {{about}} is a strange use of time, it's actually an improvement to the article in question.

You don't have e-mail posted, so I can't make this a private note, but feel free to delete it if you wish. Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 23:34, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

No worries, of course a public note is fine since every contribution I make is public anyways.

I was really surprised to see your message, as I was not intending to make fun of the user in any way at all. I originally contacted him because I noticed he was getting warnings about vandalism when all his changes were positive, and never vandalized even once– this was to thank him for his contributions, welcome him to wikipedia, and apologize for the accusations of vandalism that others had made.

Although my second comment was intended as a friendly note, I can see how it might be interpreted otherwise. When I said, "puts much effort into something that only he really understands", I meant, "other people don't see it as something very important, but he does". Re-reading it, I can see your issue with it, but when I said that only he thinks it's important, I didn't mean that it isn't important, just that the other two users did not see it as such. Perhaps that's not how the comment reads, but it's what I meant.

So thanks for your note. Had I not read that comment again with a more objective eye, in light of what you said, I really wouldn't have imagined it to be construed as anything other than a mildly funny (or perhaps not funny at all) joke. -Frazzydee|✍ 00:13, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your positive reaction above -- I very rarely slap people on the wrist and this is actually the first time I've done it on WP to a stranger. I worry about this sort of thing because my son, a technical writer who would have been an asset to WP, had a bad first experience and hasn't edited since. It seemed to me that User:174.3.123.220 got a raw deal, first from User:Zhang He (which you were the first to put down), and then from your joke, which Donmike10 joined.

My concern is that while certainly you both meant to be funny, calling someone by a name that's not their own can be a form of bullying. Here on WP, where many of our users have English as a second or third language, it's likely to be misinterpreted. The fact is, I may have misinterpreted it -- I don't have a clue why you picked "Jamie", except that it's not gender specific. Jokes that would be utterly routine banter among friends often fall flat with people from other cultures or languages.

I also reacted -- maybe overreacted -- to your both speaking of the User on his/her own talk page in the third person. It's clumsy, but better, I think, to say "User:174.3.123.220" and "you" rather than "this user".

I don't know policy here -- you're the long time admin, Frazzydee -- can we just wipe out everything on User:174.3.123.220's talk page except maybe the first three paragraphs of the section April 2010 and start him/her over with a new, personal, welcome note? Or something like that? I leave it to your judgment.... Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 11:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't think it would be appropriate for me to wipe out another user's talk page, especially if I believe I have erred. User:174.3.123.220 can always wipe it himself, but I've apologized on the talk page in any case. -Frazzydee|✍ 12:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, you will notice that I only referred to 174.3.123.220 in the third person in the first part of my second comment, which was meant as a joke. When addressing him/her, I did use the word "you", for what it's worth. Similar with donmike10's comment– he was addressing me so said "him/her" instead of "you". And (s)he is located in Calgary,[8] so I don't think that misinterpretation because of language facilities is likely. Anyways, I'm sorry that my failed attempt at humour was so badly executed. -Frazzydee|✍ 16:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey, you've been an admin for a long time, so you have to be fundamentally a good person with the patience of Job -- I didn't and don't question your good intentions, just your execution, which is now behind us. My search told me the IP address was in Edmonton, but that's beside the point -- he/she might have been anywhere.... It's too bad there's further piling on from 217.39.48.213, which you've commented on on the user page. I wish there were some way to phone the person and say, "Hey, it usually isn't this way -- it's really a pretty good place."

BTW, a WHOIS will show you only the location of the head office of the ISP. Use something like this to find the actual location of an IP address. A WHOIS on mine shows New Jersey, but the IP locater shows me correctly in Massachusetts.

Regards, Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 20:57, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Right, thanks for the correction. And by the way, my having been an admin for a long time doesn't necessarily mean that I know what I'm doing, and I do appreciate you bringing any oversights to my attention. I'm sure anybody else would feel the same. You shouldn't feel reluctant to address any potential issues with anybody- regardless of how long they've been on wikipedia. After all, there is no cabal (or at least I haven't been invited to it yet!) ;) -Frazzydee|✍ 21:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Living Videotext

No problem. Like your text better, so I've left it as is. Just editing some links a bit to make them hit other articles directly instead of redirecting. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 01:52, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Crash numbers

Sorry, can't help. I see contradictory information in the links. More reliable information should emerge soon, if it has not already. Sourcelat0r (talk) 07:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Jamie

Thanks for the message.

Sorry I didn't reply: On wikipedia, when you try to make conversation with another user, and in so doing, invest time in a relationship, it becomes tedious when the other person doesn't reciprocate.

But I like the name Jamie, and feel free to call me Jamie:-)

And no, I didn't take offence to anything you said:-) You were being friendly. Your messages where not personal attacks, and I know how some editors can see it that way:-)174.3.123.220 (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Black Sambo

Well, if you feel it is controversial, feel free to revert my change.

I didn't think it was important to include this biographical information on the story. None of the other articles have this more-or-less disclaimer on articles. (not to mention wp:NDA)

But, like I said, if it is controversial, feel free to revert me.174.3.123.220 (talk) 08:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't see it that way: but I reverted myself anyhow.174.3.123.220 (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Deltions otherususes4`

Currently the template is a redirect. Would it be just as good to submit it at tfd?174.3.123.220 (talk) 09:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I will need an administrator to complete the tfd or rfd process:-)174.3.123.220 (talk) 09:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I think the attitude would be that it causes no harm so why not keep it as a redirect? Usually tfd's are successful when the template (content) is not needed. Old templates are typically kept as a redirect as long as they're still in use. You can try nominating if you want.

Instead, if you're serious about this, I would recommend marking the template as deprecated. See Template:Tdeprecated. I don't think it would be contentious, considering it's already been decided that the name should change.

When the template becomes orphaned & deprecated it may be a criteria for speedy deletion, see Wikipedia:Deprecated and orphaned templates. In any case, it will put editors on notice that they should be using {{about}} instead. Actually getting it to an orphaned state (not used by any articles) might be a problem.

As I mentioned before, User:Tim1357 wrote a bot that orphans templates which should make your life easier. See here: Wikipedia_talk:Templates_for_discussion#TFD_Helper_bot. Not sure if it's still running, but you can ask. Probably best to ask to run the bot when it's clear there are no objections- leave the orphaned notice up there for a couple weeks and leave a note on the template talk page, creator's talk page, and maybe talk pages for other frequent editors.

By the way, even if the bot isn't running, a template marked as orphaned should attract other editors to help you out.

Good luck, and let me know if you have any questions or need help.

Frazzydee|✍ 09:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

I would still need an administrator to mark the redirect as deprecated. It is only editable by admins.174.3.123.220 (talk) 10:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Sure, let's try to file a tfd. Could you help me with that? Thanks in advance.174.3.123.220 (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

If you want to nominate for deletion, please nominate at WP:TFD first and then I'll put the notice up. But I would try the bot route first as long as there is consensus to do so, see Tim's response below. By the way, I didn't even notice that the template was protected, sorry :$ -Frazzydee|✍ 23:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Unregistered Unable To Email

That's right, I believe unregistered users cannot send emails.174.3.123.220 (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Gargoylebot's Talkpage

I noticed that it redirects to the owner's talk page. I might be best to leave just that one comment on the owner talkpage.:-)174.3.123.220 (talk) 23:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

How do I....

How do I make a new article?

fc1109

Good question

I blocked him on the assumption that he was a returning vandal, although I have no idea which one. Must've been one I'd blocked. I've actually spent more time in the article space over the last couple of days polishing up a new article. If you think a week's too long, I'll gladly reduce the time of the block. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I'll go ahead and unblock the address. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

[Page blanked]

D FARK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Above content added by User:D FARKKKKK[9], manually re-inserted because edit blanked the page. -Frazzydee|✍ 05:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Contradict

Actually, I intended to put the template up there. The article contradicts both those articles. Is there a template or can we make a template, or can we amend the template so that we can include multiple articles and/or sections like {{merge-multiple}}?174.3.123.220 (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Frizzie!

I hope you don't mind me giving you a nickname as well:-)

Thanks for the template: I'll put it to use right now and see it how it goes:-)

Thanks again!174.3.123.220 (talk) 11:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Don't forget to add it to wp:template messages!:-)174.3.123.220 (talk) 11:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Tweeking Required?

[10]

Doesn't seem to work... What's wrong?174.3.123.220 (talk) 11:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Well, I think split-multiple doesn't force specify a talk page. I am not sure, but I think that when this is not specified, they just discuss splitting on the main article. So for example, when say Science has a split-multiple proposal into Chemistry and Physics (let's say that Science has grown so much again that chemistry information and physics information is included in the Science article, that someone proposed to split it, but the editor means to move the new information to the Chem and Physics article so that Science is not as unfocused), this discussion is usually occurs on Science, *if the talk page is not specified*.174.3.123.220 (talk) 19:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

rfd not likely to pass

You mentioned that I should take {{otheruses4}} to tfd.

Looking at the discussion, it is not likely to pass. Would people accuse me of forumshopping if I take it to tfd?174.3.123.220 (talk) 15:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not sure. But I can imagine it might not be looked upon favourably if you nominated on one forum, got a decision you didn't like, and nominated it again as soon as discussion ended.

Why did you list it on WP:RFD and not WP:TFD? A similar template was deleted via TFD a couple months back for very similar reasons (Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_13#Template:Otheruses1), so maybe the audience is different. -Frazzydee|✍ 16:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I think at the time, it wasn't orphaned.174.3.123.220 (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

OK. For all good intentions, I'll list it at tfd so it will be listed before the rfd closes.174.3.123.220 (talk) 16:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_17#Template:Otheruses4 I hope you don't mind finishing the tfd for me (the page is protected so I can't do step 1).174.3.123.220 (talk) 17:04, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I think adding a TFD tag would break the redirect. Best just to make a note on the talk page. -Frazzydee|✍ 17:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Per the instructions at Wikipedia:TFD, redirects should be nominated at WP:RFD not at WP:TFD. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't know that, thanks. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Treaty of Trianon

Hello. I saw that you added the template for "this article appears to contradict the articles Vienna Awards and Pozsony County. ". May i ask why do you think that this article contradict the Vienna Award? Thank you.iadrian (talk) 18:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

I only added it in an administrative capacity after I mistakenly removed it. The original user who added it was User:174.3.123.220 (see [11][12]). -Frazzydee|✍ 21:59, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I really don`t see the reason for that template to be present at the article so i removed it. Greetings. iadrian (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you frizzie for notifying me of this.:-)174.3.123.220 (talk) 00:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Here's the URL

[13]174.3.123.220 (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't see the problem. Clicking it takes you straight to the last message left on your talk page. -Frazzydee|✍ 20:35, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Jamie

You are may be interested in this discussion. Sole Soul (talk) 04:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Snake skeleton pictures

I would like to download these onto the Hungarian Wikipedia, but it can only be done from the creative commons. The uploading does not work from the present source. If not on the Commons location could you please oblige? LouisBB (talk) 14:09, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure which images you're referring to, could you please give me a link to it? You'd like me to re-upload it to the Commons, is that correct? -Frazzydee|✍ 21:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Joints of the snake skull I did not manage to download. I presumed that it was not a Commons picture. Perhaps this could have been my fault? LouisBB (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I have re-uploaded it to the commons for you: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snake_skull_joints_lateral_view.jpeg. -Frazzydee|✍ 05:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello Frazzydee, The picture is now on the Hungarian WP, and a hu version has also appeared in the Commons under the same title, with some of the text translated relating to the figure, without captions (but there were no captions with this figure). However, because a source is not given (and some other details also missing) a threat appeared, that without description within a week the picture might be removed. I have noticed however, that the same note is also present with the English version without the threatening note. Can you provide a source please? Regards LouisBB (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

The source is indicated on the commons image page: "This file has been (or is hereby) released into the public domain by its author, Mokele at the English Wikipedia project." Is this insufficient at the Hungarian WP? -Frazzydee|✍ 02:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Voith

The article Michael Voith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails to meet biography guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 05:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Laura Black.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laura Black.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Viruses is back

Hello, We at WikiProject Viruses noticed that you used to be a participant of the project before the project went inactive. We would like to take this opportunity to invite you to become a participant of WikiProject Viruses again. We believe that viruses are an extremely important part of an encyclopedia, and that is why we need you! Our new project coordinator is Thomas888b (talk · contribs).
We hope you seriously consider our invitation. See you there. If you are interested in joining our crew again, please place a notice on Our Talkpage, or you will be removed from our participants list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 21:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

Nomination of Michael Voith for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Voith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Voith until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. v/r - TP 21:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bookmooch logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bookmooch logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:20, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Frazzydee,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 23:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Virus Revival

You have previously shown an interest in Wikiproject Viruses by adding your name to our List of Participants. We are currently reviving the project, and would be grateful if you could indicate whether you are still interested in contributing or not on our Talk Page. You do not need to have expertise in virology to contribute to our project, as we welcome people with any degree of knowledge of the subject.
Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Viruses at 17:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC).

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikify

Template:Wikify has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Ryan Vesey 14:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Academy for Gifted Children for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Academy for Gifted Children is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academy for Gifted Children until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   22:57, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 21:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Kharkiv07 (T) 03:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 03:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the note. -Frazzydee|✍ 05:49, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Frazzydee. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Frazzydee.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Frazzydee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Frazzydee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Frazzydee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Lily of the valley

An article that you have been involved in editing—Lily of the valley—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. mettokki (talk) 03:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Direct Energy logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Direct Energy logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazy Bones logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crazy Bones logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikify

Template:Wikify has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  00:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Frazzydee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikify

Template:Wikify has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kamafa Delgato _(Lojbanist)^{Styrofoam is not made from kittens.} 23:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. -Frazzydee|✍ 18:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. -Frazzydee|✍ 18:55, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the update, and for informing us of the policy. -Frazzydee|✍ 18:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikify

Template:Wikify has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DemonDays64 (talk) 04:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I have done that. -Frazzydee|✍ 18:04, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gogo's Crazy Bones logo (2).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gogo's Crazy Bones logo (2).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for keeping me in the loop. -Frazzydee|✍ 14:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I will try to get back into things this year! -Frazzydee|✍ 01:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. -Frazzydee|✍ 14:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. -Frazzydee|✍ 17:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

(untitled)

you are a fool — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:B500:710:ACAF:3C88:5CCE:FB65 (talk) 14:16, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 03:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Frazzydee a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 16:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! -Frazzydee|✍ 03:42, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 03:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Thank you -Frazzydee|✍ 07:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 07:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. -Frazzydee|✍ 02:13, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)