Talk:Parliamentary system
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Redirect
[edit]Any reason Parliamentary redirects to Parliament instead of here? I ran into the problem looking for information parliamentary systems and when I was sent to Parliament thought maybe the page didn't exist at all.
Or perhaps add this to the disambig page for Parliament. Peyna 19:14:44, 2005-08-29 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
"Parliamentary" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Parliamentary and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 21 § Parliamentary until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Help me to revert this latest "vandalism"
[edit]Here look this trash edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1182276512&oldid=1181816650&title=Parliamentary_system
The problem: I would simply revert, but some good people like @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz edited out a little but not most of that trash, instead of me reverting the latest edits of the good guys, I'll leave this warning to get them to do it. If not, I'm a noob, so the simplest path is for me to revert until to before the vandalism, but I wait until you decide the best path. Santropedro (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Santropedro, I was editing on my phone when I did that partial revert, and obviously didn't notice how many irrelevant wikilinks had been inserted. Thanks for drawing it to my attention. I think I've cleaned them all up. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 02:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for doing that job! I came back after remembering this situation. I sent you a thank you notification for your edit. See you. Santropedro (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class politics articles
- Top-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Systems articles
- Mid-importance Systems articles
- Unassessed field Systems articles
- WikiProject Systems articles