Jump to content

User talk:Ram-Man

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:RM)


_

_

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ram-Man. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Licencing

[edit]

Your licencing campaign is really well thought-out and reasoned. I am a newer editor with few edits, but you have my support! (If you want my licencing list it is here. Rorix the White (talk)

Hello Ram-Man, I am doing a wetland interpretive display and wondered if I could us your image as reference for a digital drawing I am doing for it, please. It's a great image

Yellow Coneflower Echinacea paradoxa Single Flower Bee

Thanks, in advance, Scott

Reusing image of Reading locomotive 1251

[edit]

Is it alright if I reuse photo RR72.18.1A Saddle-tank No. 1251 Front Side.jpg for a new Wikipedia page I am making? If no, then I can just use one of the others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someone who likes train writing (talkcontribs) 17:06, July 30, 2021 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Alamogordo, New Mexico

[edit]

Alamogordo, New Mexico has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Lincolnshire, Illinois

[edit]

Lincolnshire, Illinois has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Wilsonville, Oregon

[edit]

Wilsonville, Oregon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]