Ground-effect vehicle

"Ekranoplan" redirects here. For the music album, see Ekranoplan (album).

Ekranoplan A-90 Orlyonok

A ground-effect vehicle (GEV), also called a wing-in-ground-effect (WIGE or WIG), ground-effect craft/machine (GEM), wingship, flarecraft, surface effect vehicle or ekranoplan (Russian: экранопла́н – "screenglider"), is a vehicle that is able to move over the surface by gaining support from the reactions of the air against the surface of the earth or water. Typically, it is designed to glide over a level surface (usually over the sea) by making use of ground effect, the aerodynamic interaction between the moving wing and the surface below. Some models can operate over any flat area such as frozen lakes or flat plains similar to a hovercraft. The term Ground-Effect Vehicle originally referred to any craft utilizing ground effect, including what is known later as hovercraft, in descriptions of patents during the 1950s. However, this term is nowadays regarded as distinct from air-cushion vehicles or hovercraft. The definition of GEVs does not include racecars utilizing ground-effect for increasing downforce.

Design

A ground-effect vehicle needs some forward velocity to produce lift dynamically, and the principal benefit of operating a wing in ground effect is to reduce its lift-dependent drag. The basic design principle is that the closer the wing operates to an external surface such as the ground, when it is said to be in ground effect, the less drag it experiences.

An airfoil passing through air increases air pressure on the underside, while decreasing pressure across the top. The high and low pressures are maintained until they flow off the ends of the wings, where they form vortices which in turn are the major cause of lift-induced drag—normally a significant portion of the drag affecting an aircraft. The greater the span of a wing, the less induced drag created for each unit of lift and the greater the efficiency of the particular wing. This is the primary reason gliders have long wings.

Placing the same wing near a surface such as the water or the ground has the same effect as increasing the aspect ratio because the ground prevents wingtip vortices from expanding, but without having the complications associated with a long and slender wing, so that the short stubs on a GEV can produce just as much lift as the much larger wing on a transport aircraft, though it can do this only when close to the earth's surface. Once sufficient speed has built up, some GEVs may be capable of leaving ground effect and functioning as normal aircraft until they approach their destination. The distinguishing characteristic is that they are unable to land or take off without a significant amount of help from the ground effect cushion, and cannot climb until they have reached a much higher speed.

A GEV is sometimes characterized as a transition between a hovercraft and an aircraft, although this is not correct as a hovercraft is statically supported upon a cushion of pressurized air from an onboard downward-directed fan. Some GEV designs, such as the Russian Lun and Dingo, have used forced blowing under the wing by auxiliary engines to increase the high pressure area under the wing to assist the takeoff; however they differ from hovercraft in still requiring forward motion to generate sufficient lift to fly.

Although the GEV may look similar to the seaplane and share many technical characteristics, it is generally not designed to fly out of ground effect. It differs from the hovercraft in lacking low-speed hover capability in much the same way that a fixed-wing airplane differs from the helicopter. Unlike the hydrofoil, it does not have any contact with the surface of the water when in "flight". The ground-effect vehicle constitutes a unique class of transportation.

The Boston-based (United States) company REGENT proposed an electric-powered high-wing design with a standard hull for water operations, but also incorporated fore- and aft-mounted hydrofoil units designed to lift the craft out of the water during takeoff run, to facilitate lower liftoff speeds.

Wing configurations

WIG-wings configurations: (A) Ekranoplan; (B) Reverse-delta wing; (C) Tandem wing.

A Russian light ekranoplan Aquaglide-2

Straight wing

Used by the Russian Rostislav Alexeyev for his ekranoplan. The wings are significantly shorter than those of comparable aircraft, and this configuration requires a high aft-placed horizontal tail to maintain stability. The pitch and altitude stability comes from the lift slope difference between a front low wing in ground-effect (commonly the main wing) and an aft, higher-located second wing nearly out of ground-effect (generally named a stabilizer).

Reverse-delta wing

Developed by Alexander Lippisch, this wing allows stable flight in ground-effect through self-stabilization. This is the main Class B form of GEV. Hanno Fischer later developed WIG craft based on the configuration, which were then transferred to multiple companies in Asia, thus becoming one of the "standards" in GEV design.

Tandem wings

Tandem wings can have three configurations:

• A biplane-style type-1 utilising a shoulder-mounted main lift wing and belly-mounted sponsons similar to those on combat and transport helicopters.
• A canard-style type-2 with a mid-size horizontal wing near the nose of the craft directing airflow under the main lift airfoil. This type-2 tandem design is a major improvement during takeoff, as it creates an air cushion to lift the craft above the water at a lower speed, thereby reducing water drag, which is the biggest obstacle to successful seaplane launches.
• Two stubby wings as in the tandem-airfoil flairboat produced by Günther Jörg in Germany. His particular design is self-stabilizing longitudinally.

Advantages and disadvantages

Given similar hull size and power, and depending on its specific design, the lower lift-induced drag of a GEV, as compared to an aircraft of similar capacity, will improve its fuel efficiency and, up to a point, its speed. GEVs are also much faster than surface vessels of similar power, because they avoid drag from the water.

On the water the aircraft-like construction of GEVs increases the risk of damage in collisions with surface objects. Furthermore, the limited number of egress points make it more difficult to evacuate the vehicle in an emergency. According to WST, the builders of the WIG craft WSH-500, GEVs furthermore have the advantage of avoiding conflict with ocean currents by flying over them.

Since most GEVs are designed to operate from water, accidents and engine failure typically are less hazardous than in a land-based aircraft, but the lack of altitude control leaves the pilot with fewer options for avoiding collision, and to some extent that negates such benefits. Low altitude brings high-speed craft into conflict with ships, buildings and rising land, which may not be sufficiently visible in poor conditions to avoid. GEVs may be unable to climb over or turn sharply enough to avoid collisions, while drastic, low-level maneuvers risk contact with solid or water hazards beneath. Aircraft can climb over most obstacles, but GEVs are more limited.

In high winds, take-off must be into the wind, which takes the craft across successive lines of waves, causing heavy pounding, stressing the craft and creating an uncomfortable ride. In light winds, waves may be in any direction, which can make control difficult as each wave causes the vehicle to both pitch and roll. The lighter construction of GEVs makes their ability to operate in higher sea states less than that of conventional ships, but greater than the ability of hovercraft or hydrofoils, which are closer to the water surface.

Like conventional aircraft, greater power is needed for takeoff, and, like seaplanes, ground-effect vehicles must get on the step before they can accelerate to flight speed. Careful design, usually with multiple redesigns of hullforms, is required to get this right, which increases engineering costs. This obstacle is more difficult for GEVs with short production runs to overcome. For the vehicle to work, its hull needs to be stable enough longitudinally to be controllable yet not so stable that it cannot lift off the water.

The bottom of the vehicle must be formed to avoid excessive pressures on landing and taking off without sacrificing too much lateral stability, and it must not create too much spray, which damages the airframe and the engines. The Russian ekranoplans show evidence of fixes for these problems in the form of multiple chines on the forward part of the hull undersides and in the forward location of the jet engines.

Finally, limited utility has kept production levels low enough that it has been impossible to amortize development costs sufficiently to make GEVs competitive with conventional aircraft.

A 2014 study by students at NASA's Ames Research Center claims that use of GEVs for passenger travel could lead to cheaper flights, increased accessibility and less pollution.

Classification

One obstacle to GEV development is the classification and legislation to be applied. The International Maritime Organization has studied the application of rules based on the International Code of Safety for High-Speed Craft (HSC code) which was developed for fast ships such as hydrofoils, hovercraft, catamarans and the like. The Russian Rules for classification and construction of small type A ekranoplans is a document upon which most GEV design is based. However, in 2005, the IMO classified the WISE or GEV under the category of ships.

The International Maritime Organization recognizes three types of GEVs:

1. A craft which is certified for operation only in ground effect;
2. A craft which is certified to temporarily increase its altitude to a limited height outside the influence of ground effect but not exceeding 150 m (490 ft) above the surface; and
3. A craft which is certified for operation outside ground effect and exceeding 150 m (490 ft) above the surface.

At the time of writing, those classes only applied to craft carrying 12 passengers or more, and (as of 2019) there was disagreement between national regulatory agencies about whether these vehicles should be classified, and regulated, as aircraft or as boats.

History

Artist's concept of a Lun-class ekranoplan in flight

By the 1920s, the ground effect phenomenon was well-known, as pilots found that their airplanes appeared to become more efficient as they neared the runway surface during landing. In 1934 the US National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics issued Technical Memorandum 771, Ground Effect on the Takeoff and Landing of Airplanes, which was a translation into English of a summary of French research on the subject. The French author Maurice Le Sueur had added a suggestion based on this phenomenon: "Here the imagination of inventors is offered a vast field. The ground interference reduces the power required for level flight in large proportions, so here is a means of rapid and at the same time economic locomotion: Design an airplane which is always within the ground-interference zone. At first glance this apparatus is dangerous because the ground is uneven and the altitude called skimming permits no freedom of maneuver. But on large-sized aircraft, over water, the question may be attempted ..."

By the 1960s, the technology started maturing, in large part due to the independent contributions of Rostislav Alexeyev in the Soviet Union and German Alexander Lippisch, working in the United States. Alexeyev worked from his background as a ship designer whereas Lippisch worked as an aeronautical engineer. The influence of Alexeyev and Lippisch remains noticeable in most GEVs seen today.

Canada

It is said that the research hydrofoil HD-4 by Alexander Graham Bell have part of its dynamic lift contributed by its pair of wings operating in ground effect. However it is dubious whether the designer was aware of its existence due to the relative infancy of aerodynamics.

Avro Canada investigated into aircraft with a Coanda-effect propulsion system. Such jets were supposed to create an air cushion below the airframe that will allow them to hover on the ground. In fact, of the only test aircraft built, this was the only mode they could possibly operate from due to stability issues when taking off. The designs were later further developed by the United States, while Convair could have possibly been inspired by them to create a preliminary design of a large ocean-going ground-effect ship called Hydroskimmer.

Ground-effect vehicles combining hydrofoils were filed as patents in Canada.

As of 2024, there had been a very limited renewed interest in GEVs in Canada. Independent individuals and aspiring students have proposed ideas of utilizing WIG craft for transport in the Arctic and as an alternative to sealift. Some of the material in question have been published into the Internet. The use of ground-effect vehicles to provide transportation along major Canadian cities with water bodies was thought to be a possibly way of reducing traffic without heavy investment into rights-of-way.

Soviet Union

The Bartini Beriev VVA-14, developed during the 1970s

Model of the Beriev Be-2500 concept aircraft

Led by Alexeyev, the Soviet Central Hydrofoil Design Bureau (Russian: ЦКБ СПК) was the center of ground-effect craft development in the USSR. The vehicle came to be known as an ekranoplan (Russian: экранопла́н, экран screen + план plane, from Russian: эффект экрана, literally screen effect, or ground effect in English). The military potential for such a craft was soon recognized, and Alexeyev received support and financial resources from Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev.

Some manned and unmanned prototypes were built, ranging up to eight tonnes in displacement. This led to the development of a 550-tonne military ekranoplan of 92 m (302 ft) length. The craft was dubbed the Caspian Sea Monster by U.S. intelligence experts, after a huge, unknown craft was spotted on satellite reconnaissance photos of the Caspian Sea area in the 1960s. With its short wings, it looked airplane-like in planform, but would probably be incapable of flight. Although it was designed to travel a maximum of 3 m (10 ft) above the sea, it was found to be most efficient at 20 m (66 ft), reaching a top speed of 300–400 knots (560–740 km/h) in research flights.

The Soviet ekranoplan program continued with the support of Minister of Defence Dmitriy Ustinov. It produced the most successful ekranoplan so far, the 125-tonne A-90 Orlyonok. These craft were originally developed as high-speed military transports and were usually based on the shores of the Caspian Sea and Black Sea. The Soviet Navy ordered 120 Orlyonok-class ekranoplans, but this figure was later reduced to fewer than 30 vessels, with planned deployment mainly in the Black Sea and Baltic Sea fleets.

A few Orlyonoks served with the Soviet Navy from 1979 to 1992. In 1987, the 400-tonne Lun-class ekranoplan was built as an anti-ship missile launch platform. A second Lun, renamed Spasatel, was laid down as a rescue vessel, but was never finished. The two major problems that the Soviet ekranoplans faced were poor longitudinal stability and a need for reliable navigation.

Minister Ustinov died in 1984, and the new Minister of Defence, Marshal Sokolov, cancelled funding for the program. Only three operational Orlyonok-class ekranoplans (with revised hull design) and one Lun-class ekranoplan remained at a naval base near Kaspiysk.

Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, ekranoplans have been produced by the Volga Shipyard in Nizhniy Novgorod. Smaller ekranoplans for non-military use have been under development. The CHDB had already developed the eight-seat Volga-2 in 1985, and Technologies and Transport is developing a smaller version called the Amphistar. Beriev proposed a large craft of the type, the Be-2500, as a "flying ship" cargo carrier, but nothing came of the project.

United States of America

During the 1950s, the US Navy investigated into anti-submarine vessels operating on the ram effect, a product of ground effect. Such vessels were to use this to create an air cushion below the hulls that will allow hovering. If this is not possible, additional engines were to be used to artificially blow air underneath the craft. The project was designated RAM-2. Several other projects were proposed throughout the early Cold War, some using a similar mix of wings and lift engines while others are more akin to Russian types. More than a decade later, General Dynamics designed catamaran vessels equipped with ground-effect and filed them as patents.

Germany

Lippisch Type and Hanno Fischer

The Rhein-Flugzeugbau X-114 in flight.

In Germany, Lippisch was asked to build a very fast boat for American businessman Arthur A. Collins. In 1963 Lippisch developed the X-112, a revolutionary design with reversed delta wing and T-tail. This design proved to be stable and efficient in ground effect, and even though it was successfully tested, Collins decided to stop the project and sold the patents to the German company Rhein Flugzeugbau (RFB), which further developed the inverse delta concept into the X-113 and the six-seat X-114. These craft could be flown out of ground effect so that, for example, peninsulas could be overflown.

Hanno Fischer took over the works from RFB and created his own company, Fischer Flugmechanik, which eventually completed two models. The Airfisch 3 carried two persons, and the FS-8 carried six persons. The FS-8 was to be developed by Fischer Flugmechanik for a Singapore-Australian joint venture called Flightship. Powered by a V8 Chevrolet automobile engine rated at 337 kW, the prototype made its first flight in February 2001 in the Netherlands. The company no longer exists but the prototype craft was bought by Wigetworks, a company based in Singapore and renamed as AirFish 8. In 2010, that vehicle was registered as a ship in the Singapore Registry of Ships.

The University of Duisburg-Essen is supporting an ongoing research project to develop the Hoverwing.

Günther Jörg-type tandem-airfoil flairboat

A tandem flarecraft Skimmerfoil Jörg IV located at the SAAF Museum, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
(It has since been removed from the museum)

German engineer Günther Jörg, who had worked on Alexeyev's first designs and was familiar with the challenges of GEV design, developed a GEV with two wings in a tandem arrangement, the Jörg-II. It was the third, manned, tandem-airfoil boat, named "Skimmerfoil", which was developed during his consultancy period in South Africa. It was a simple and low-cost design of a first 4-seater tandem-airfoil flairboat completely constructed of aluminium. The prototype was in the SAAF Port Elizabeth Museum from 4 July 2007 until 2013, and is now in private use. Pictures of the museum show the boat after some years outside the museum and without protection against the sun.

The consultancy of Günther Jörg, a specialist and insider of German airplane industry from 1963 and a colleague of Alexander Lippisch and Hanno Fischer, was founded with a fundamental knowledge of wing in ground effect physics, as well as results of fundamental tests under different conditions and designs having begun in 1960. For over 30 years, Jörg built and tested 15 different tandem-airfoil flairboats in different sizes and made of different materials.

The following tandem-airfoil flairboat (TAF) types had been built after a previous period of nearly 10 years of research and development:

1. TAB VII-3: First manned tandem W.I.G type Jörg, being built at Technical University of Darmstadt, Akaflieg
2. TAF VII-5: Second manned tandem-airfoil Flairboat, 2 seater made of wood
3. TAF VIII-1: 2-seater tandem-airfoil flairboat built of glass-reinforced plastic (GRP) and aluminium. A small serie of 6 Flairboats had been produced by former Botec Company
4. TAF VIII-2: 4-seater tandem-airfoil Flairboat built of full aluminium (2 units) and built of GRP (3 units)
5. TAF VIII-3: 8-seater tandem-airfoil Flairboat built of aluminium combined with GRP parts
6. TAF VIII-4: 12-seater tandem-airfoil Flairboat built of aluminium combined with GRP parts
7. TAF VIII-3B: 6-seater tandem-airfoil flairboat under carbon fibre composite construction

Bigger concepts are: 25-seater, 32-seater, 60-seater, 80-seater and bigger up to the size of a passenger airplane.

1980–1999

Since the 1980s GEVs have been primarily smaller craft designed for the recreational and civilian ferry markets. Germany, Russia and the United States have provided most of the activity with some development in Australia, China, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. In these countries and regions, small craft with up to ten seats have been built. Other larger designs such as ferries and heavy transports have been proposed but have not been carried to completion.

Besides the development of appropriate design and structural configuration, automatic control and navigation systems have been developed. These include altimeters with high accuracy for low altitude flight and lesser dependence on weather conditions. "Phase radio altimeters" have become the choice for such applications beating laser altimeter, isotropic or ultrasonic altimeters.

With Russian consultation, the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) studied the Aerocon Dash 1.6 wingship.

A Hoverwing

Universal Hovercraft developed a flying hovercraft, first flying a prototype in 1996. Since 1999, the company has offered plans, parts, kits and manufactured ground effect hovercraft called the Hoverwing.

2000-

Iran deployed three squadrons of Bavar 2 two-seat GEVs in September 2010. This GEV carries one machine gun and surveillance gear, and incorporates features to reduce its radar signature. In October 2014, satellite images showed the GEV in a shipyard in southern Iran. The GEV has two engines and no armament.

In Singapore, Wigetworks obtained certification from Lloyd's Register for entry into class. On 31 March 2011, AirFish 8-001 became one of the first GEVs to be flagged with the Singapore Registry of Ships, one of the largest ship registries. Wigetworks partnered with National University of Singapore's Engineering Department to develop higher capacity GEVs.

Burt Rutan in 2011 and Korolev in 2015 showed GEV projects.

In Korea, Wing Ship Technology Corporation developed and tested a 50-seat passenger GEV named the WSH-500. in 2013

Estonian transport company Sea Wolf Express planned to launch passenger service in 2019 between Helsinki and Tallinn, a distance of 87 km taking only half an hour, using a Russian-built ekranoplan. The company ordered 15 ekranoplans with maximum speed of 185 km/h and capacity of 12 passengers, built by Russian RDC Aqualines.

In 2021 Brittany Ferries announced that they were looking into using REGENT (Regional Electric Ground Effect Naval Transport) ground effect craft "seagliders" for cross English Channel services. Southern Airways Express also placed firm orders for seagliders with intent to operate them along Florida's east coast.

Around mid-2022, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) launched its Liberty Lifter project, with the goal of creating a low-cost seaplane that would use the ground-effect to extend its range. The program aims to carry 90 tons over 6,500 nautical miles (12,000 km), operate at sea without ground-based maintenance, all using low-cost materials.

In late 2022, with the release of the movie "Avatar: The Way of Water", a fictional WIGE ship designated the General Dynamics S-76 SeaDragon was presented to the public.[1] Depicted extensively in the film, the vessel was intended to hunt a fictional whale species and the design appears to be influenced by the actual GD GEV designs, the SeaStar "flying frigate" and the littoral combat ship Sea Fighter as both ships share common design features such as a light defensive armament and the ability to deploy boats. Interestingly, the placement of the helipad, bridge and well dock of the fictional WIGE ship coincides with the Sea Fighter.

In May 2024, Ocean Glider announced a deal with UK-based investor MONTE to finance $145m of a $700m deal to begin operating 25 REGENT seagliders between destinations in New Zealand. The order includes 15 12-seater Viceroys and 10 100-seater Monarchs.

See also

• Aerodynamically alleviated marine vehicle
• Flying Platform
• Ground effect (aerodynamics)
• Ground-effect train
• Hovercraft
• List of ground-effect vehicles
• Surface effect ship
• Caspian Sea Monster

Footnotes

Bibliography

• Abramowski, Tomasz (2007). "Numerical Investigation of Airfoil in Ground Proximity" (PDF). Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. 45 (2). Warsaw: 425–436. ISSN 1429-2955. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 22, 2010.
• Aubin, S.Y.; de Monchaux, John (June 2001). Easy Ways to Study Ground Effects. Toulouse, France: EAGES 2001 International Ground Effect Symposium.
• Fishwick, Simon (2001). Low Flying Boats. Thorpe Bay, Southend-on-Sea, Essex, UK: Amateur Yacht Research Society. ISBN 0-85133-126-2.
• Forsberg, Randall (1995). The Arms Production Dilemma: Contraction and Restraint in the World Combat Aircraft Industry. Boston, MA: The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-56085-6.
• Garrison, Peter (September 16, 2011). "Faster than a Boat". Flying.
• Gunston, Bill (2000). The Osprey Encyclopedia of Russian Aircraft. Oxford, UK: Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-096-4.
• Hirschel, Ernst Heinrich; Prem, Horst & Madelung, Gero (2003). Aeronautical Research in Germany: From Lilienthal Until Today. Berlin: Springer-Verlag and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K. ISBN 978-3-540-40645-7.
• Komissarov, Sergey; Gordon, Yefim (2010). Soviet and Russian Ekranoplans. Hersham, UK: Ian Allan Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85780-332-7..
• McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. 2002. ISBN 978-0-07-042313-8.
• Nebylov, A.V. (2002). Ekranoplanes: Controlled Flight Close to the Sea. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
• Rozhdestvensky, Kirill V. (2002). Aerodynamics of a Lifting System in Extreme Ground Effect. Berlin: Springer-Verlag and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K. ISBN 978-3-540-66277-8.
• Sharan, Sukrit (March 2007). "Complex Algorithms of Parameters Measuring Systems for Motion Close to the Sea". IX Conference for Young Scientists. St. Petersburg, Russia: CSRI-ELEKTROPRIBOR.
• Sharan, Sukrit (April 2007). "Quality Measurement Criteria for Flight Close to the Sea Surface". Seminar on Aeronautics & Space. St. Petersburg, Russia: University of Aerospace Instrumentation.
• An overview of WIG vehicles for military operations (Technical report). RTO technical report. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Research and Technology Organization (RTO), Applied Vehicle Technology (AVT) Panel, Task Group AVT-081. December 2006. doi:10.14339/RTO-TR-AVT-081 (inactive November 2, 2024). OCLC 1085143242. TR-AVT-081.{{cite tech report}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  • Lay summary in: An Overview of WIG Vehicles for Military Operations. Science & Technology Organization (Technical report). North Atlantic Treaty Organization. December 29, 2006. RTO-TR-AVT-081.

External links

• "Alekseyev A-90". Airliners.net.
• Cole, William (September 2002). "The Pelican: A Big Bird for the Long Haul". Boeing Frontiers. 1 (5).
• Teo, Francis (July 18, 2006). "Sea Eagle Wing In Ground Effect Craft Provide 80 Knots Alternatives To Marine Transportation Industry". SeaDiscovery.com. Archived from the original on January 10, 2009. Retrieved December 12, 2007.
• "Project 903 Lun Missile Launcher Ekranoplane". FAS.org. Archived from the original on December 7, 2015.
• Edgar, Julian (March 5, 2002). "Between Wind and Waves: Ekranoplans". AutoSpeed. Archived from the original on November 10, 2005.
• "Das Albatross-Prinzip". Airfoil Tandem W.I.G. Consulting (in German).
• "Ekranoplanes: Soaring above the waves". Airforce.ru.
• "Ekranoplan". Moscow Top News. Archived from the original on November 25, 2009.
• "Wing in the Ground Effect Ship". Sungwoo Engineering.
• "The Lun, sitting in drydock". Jalopnik. March 10, 2010.
• "Ground Effect and WIG Vehicles". Aerospaceweb.org.
• "СВП с АР проекта А18 («Тунгус»)" [SVP with AR project A18 ("Tungus")]. Aerohod (in Russian).
• "Flying hovercraft project Wig". MAD Hovercraft.