Talk:Laura San Giacomo

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I believe she may have other "attributes"

Now, do you have anything to add regarding her movies, acting skills, or anything else?

Atlant 23:12, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Personally I was wondering if anyone could add more about her breasts. Six paragraphs doesn't seem to capture every last detail conceivable about two fleshy orbs.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.73.52.194 (talk • contribs) .

Breast size

(I can't believe I'm doing this) Do we have any citations claiming (even as a rumour) that her bra size is 34D? They look substantially larger to me, though Ms. San Giacomo may be quite short in real life and so they may appear larger than they actually are. --Yamla June 30, 2005 20:51 (UTC)

I think this article has gone a little far on the subject of her breasts. MK2 1 July 2005 01:13 (UTC)

Agreed. Fire Star 1 July 2005 01:13 (UTC)

Now, does anyone have a more-attractive picture of her? For example, one that wasn't shot with a wide-angle lens a few inches from her chest? (I mean, look at the size of her head in proportion to her body!)

Atlant 1 July 2005 11:15 (UTC)

Those are at least double if not triple D. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.221.221.188 (talk • contribs) .

For those who missed it, there was a complete section of this article - eight paragraphs long - discussing Laura San Giacomo's breasts. If it hadn't been deleted, I was going to suggest it be split off and turned into a seperate article. Maybe we could start a whole category of celebrity bodyparts articles: Laura San Giacomo's breasts, Paul Newman's eyes, Betty Grable's legs, Jimmy Durante's nose, Jennifer Lopez' ass. MK2 16:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One might get the impression that a lot of Wiki editors are 12-14 year old boys; breast size seems to make a big impression on them.

Atlant 17:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i cant believe im doing this now....

even though her breast size was a somewhat running gag on the show, i dont think it should be incorporated on her personal page. all the "information" is specualtive, and has no place in an area designated to talk about her body of work. if it stayed on the page, why not put it under the notes as a single sentence? i suggest moving the larger part of the article to the just shoot me page. maybe in the notes section, which could eventually be turned into a "running gag" list--Macready 06:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They never looked that big to me. I've seen just about every episode, and her breasts wer nowhere near a D cup. They looked like a B cup, MAYBE large B cup tops. TJ Spyke 06:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh what a picture

That is a completely unflattering picture of Ms. Giacomo. Certainly, someone has something better to post. How about a picture of her as Nadine in The Stand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by GestaltG (talk • contribs) .

I dunno... It seems pretty flattering to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.208.241.192 (talk • contribs) .

The fact that 8 paragraphs of breast talk were deleted is a sure sign that Wikipedia is broken. Put it back.

-- Dylan 69.11.48.26

Hey, I will replace her picture with a new one. Hope nobody minds.

P.S. This article is full of personal comments (e.g. "if nothing else, the actress"...). It is more like a TV magazine article than a Wikipedia article. Unsuitable in terms of style, it should undergo a cleanup (good command of language, though!) Xanthi22 00:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Ok, now I'm thinking it, I'm not removing the already existing picture (which is awful). I will just add a new one (the movie poster from Nina Takes a Lover). I've found better pictures of her but they are either copyrighted or I don't know the source(many viscaps, too). If somebody objects to the new picture, please let me know.

Xanthi22 01:20, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That image was copyrighted, too, and was being used to depict San Giacomo, not the movie, so it was a copyright violation. Sorry, I had to remove it. --Yamla 03:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to replace that horrible image of her by uploading a new photo and citing the proper rights for noncommercial use and it was deleted for some reason. I cannot easily find out why? Was wikipedia people in the wrong for the edit this time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.98.156.89 (talk) 02:48, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like the photo that is up now (5/12/2015) -- she seems to be squinting like the light is in her eyes (which I probably was). IT HAS TO GO!--24.177.0.156 (talk) 16:56, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New pictures

I've posted two new images. In case they are also deemed unsuitable, please let me know.

Xanthi22 21:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap, sorry, neither were suitable. Both were from movies and were being used to depict the actress rather than the movie or character played. --Yamla 22:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly disagree and I've reverted the pictures back in. At least these photos look like her, rather than looking like a study of her breasts (like that awful picture we've had for months now).

Atlant 20:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of whether or not the pictures are better. It is a violation of copyright to use these images. --Yamla 21:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for clarifying that!

Atlant 21:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Yamla is right. However, how come that the articles on Tom Cruise, Demi Moore, Sigourney Weaver, Katie Holmes, Jack Nicholson and possibly hundreds of other actors also feature screenshots from their movies? Why weren't those photos (many of which go way back, to 2005) been deleted, given that they are also copyrighted images and are used to depict the actors rather than the movie or the character played?

Xanthi22 22:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what about snapped

why don't they mention the fact that she was the narrator on the show snapped? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecerda (talk • contribs) 15:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate

Worldcat, which I'd take as more reliable than those syndicated "Who was born today" pieces, reports a 1962 birthdate. For every one of the syndicated pieces giving one date, it's easy enough to find one giving the other, eg [1]. I've noted the discrepancy in the ref/footnote. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talhotblond

Can someone add the TV movie Talhotblond and correct the order. ThanksCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). 141.217.233.69 (talk) 19:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laura San Giacomo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120926125445/http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-story-laurasangiacomo-veronicamars%2C0%2C2855432.story to http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-story-laurasangiacomo-veronicamars%2C0%2C2855432.story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Filmography Section has been deleted

@Fuaacena: You have made several edits on this page on the Television and Filmography sections. You have deleted the entire Filmography Section. You have deleted and replaced the entire Television section.

What are you doing? These edits and other edits you have done appear to be test edits. If you are learning how to edit Wikipedia articles, please do test edits in your sandbox.

Continuing to edit in this manner would be vandalism.

Please stop doing these types of edits.

Osomite ^hablemos 21:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]