User talk:Latitude0116

Hi, welcome to wikipedia! We're glad to have you editing. If you need any help, feel free to check out the Wikipedia:Tutorial and Wikipedia:FAQ. Or you can ask at Wikipedia:Help Desk. Yours, Meelar 02:09, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hello, I'd like to ask you a question about the Pokémon article. Why do you feel The "unobtainable" Pokémon section belongs under the section "Codes and glitches"? I mean, how are they "glitches"? And I don't see how they're codes... Anyway, please respond soon. - Bulbaboy 21:57, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

If you have anything to say about images, go to User talk:Latitude0116/Image complaints -- Latitude0116

Polygons

Can you go to the Category:Polygons category at Wikipedia?? What do you think of it?? 66.32.255.134 00:10, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Extreme Points of the United States

I added a category. Fiddle with it as you see fit. Mackerm 05:44, 22 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Template:Nintendochar

WP:TFD decision was to delete the Template:Nintendochar template as it was far too large. It is also better to use categories in this instance.

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Enneacontakaienneagon

Can you confirm that this vote was you: [1] -- Curps 01:02, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

It is confirmed -- see This link --Latitude0116

Mohonk Preserve and Mohonk Mountain House (Resort)

Since there is now an article on the Mohonk Mountain House I thought it would make sense to rename this article Mohonk Preserve. Since you've done the most recent work on it, I thought I should let you know. Mwanner 16:06, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

Sources for colours

When you create articles for colours, could you please include some justification? For example, where does Gray-Tea Green come from? I understand that a great many of these are Crayola colours, and as such would be perfectly fine. Unfortunately without anything to justify them, they just look like cruft and are liable to "deletionist attack". --Phil | Talk June 28, 2005 11:37 (UTC)

Hoboken

Just thought I'd let you know that I have merged the articles on Hoboken parks and landmarks into one huge umbrella article, Landmarks of Hoboken, New Jersey, since it looks like you're responsible for them. It is, of course, not an irreversible change, but it both gives the tiny articles on parks (which would likely be voted to merge or maybe even delete on VfD anyway) somewhere to go and looks impressive with all the pictures and descriptions together. I have not yet changed the template or the main Hoboken article, as I didn't want to create too much extra work to undo it if no one else liked the change, but I hope you do approve of it. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 30 June 2005 16:35 (UTC)

I've reverted your edits

that changed the maps on U.S. regions articles. A lot of time, effort, and discussion went in to those maps and the defintions portrayed in them. If you have a problem with them direct it here. Thanks. -JCarriker 23:29, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Carolmarshelection.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Carolmarshelection.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Selfservegasmap.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Selfservegasmap.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:CSPpic.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:CSPpic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-SCEhard T 05:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Featured articles

Why are you nominating articles you have not worked on and have no intention to improve?--Peta 00:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Rarecandy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rarecandy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olive-yellow

You have recently created the article Olive-yellow. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Kimchi.sg 05:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Mkangaskhanevolution large.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mkangaskhanevolution large.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Missingno.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missingno.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:56, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don´t forget edit summaries

Just a reminder. All the best, Stanley011 07:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:2004ElectionControversyMap.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2004ElectionControversyMap.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Ryūlóng 03:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Missingno_ghost.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Missingno_ghost.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Nintendo characters

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Nintendo characters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:List of Nintendo characters. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Irongargoyle 19:49, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OR to Myspace

You recently added some criticism to the MySpace article without any citations. To keep articles verifiable, we ask that you cite sources showing that someone has criticized MySpace in that way because original research is bad. THank you. -- Chris chat edits essays 12:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please help

Hi! I got your username from the Association Inclusionist Wikipedians- well done on fighting the good fight. I'm trying to work against a band of linkocrites (see en:User:cochese8). You look as if you're a valuable editor and I could really use some help [preserving] a great link. I would ask you to review the discussion and vote keep if you agree with the link's value. By the way, you're welcome to ask for my vote to keep any information on this website. Thanks for your help! Cochese8 17:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibooks entries

You said, "Articles I've created in Wikibooks:
Super Mario 64 Glitches
Mario Kart Double Dash character combinations
Those appear to be empty pages (links are on your front page). Banaticus 08:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing me about this problem. It turns out that those articles were moved to StrategyWiki (I fixed the links on my userpage). I still need to clean up the lists on my userpage, which are currently outdated and now somewhat inaccurate.Latitude0116 00:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bungeeball.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bungeeball.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. YellowDot 16:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LebronLightningLemonade.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LebronLightningLemonade.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bungeeball.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bungeeball.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -SCEhard T 04:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latitude0116

Please do not recreate Latitude0116. Cross-namespace redirects such as this are to be avoided, and the page can be speedy deleted by any admin. --Interiot 17:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Anthonyrussophotos.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthonyrussophotos.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Speck_green_iPod_shuffle_skin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Speck_green_iPod_shuffle_skin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-Sun_and_VV_Cephei_A_2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Image-Sun_and_VV_Cephei_A_2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your NASA image of Hoboken

Hi. I noticed you got a satellite image of Hoboken from NASA. Can you tell me where you got it from, and whether I could get one for Union City? Thanks. Nightscream 17:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Nightscream 01:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mushroommario3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mushroommario3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 15:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Image:ESOGliese581.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ESOGliese581.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —xyzzy_n 08:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EasterIslandNASA.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:EasterIslandNASA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Selket ^Talk 21:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Glieseupdated.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Glieseupdated.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Unspecified source for Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Fair use rationale for Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 16:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Flightthatfoughtback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flightthatfoughtback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 21:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Flightthatfoughtback.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Flightthatfoughtback.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 21:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Yoohoologo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yoohoologo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Caprisunlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 04:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bubbllighnglem.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 06:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Flightthatfoughtback.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flightthatfoughtback.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Moby18album.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Moby18album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Seaworldlogo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Seaworldlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hobokennewselection1.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hobokennewselection1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:HobokenNewselection2.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:HobokenNewselection2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Lunchables2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lunchables2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aspartame Health Concerns

You've added a heavily-biased attack on Aspartame to several articles. Why? Chemguy2 22:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:G-000464-w1-500739.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:G-000464-w1-500739.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Game Boy Color Screen Capture

Hi, I am interested in learning how you created Image:Glitch_cityscrnshot.jpg. I have an idea about a project I wish to undertake, it would involve screen grabbing, however I am unsure how to go about it. Any information would be greatly appreciated. UberHalogen 15:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

9/11

Hi Latitude0116; regardless of anything else, your edits are introducing nonsense characters. Please sort that out in a sandbox. Tom Harrison ^Talk 22:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright policy advisement regarding articles

Dear Latitude0116, regarding your contributionto Randolph Mountain Club, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites, or from printed material, without the express permission of the author or copyright holder. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from this URL: http://www.randolphmountainclub.org/aboutthermc/thermctoday.html. As a copyright violation, the article has been deleted under the speedy deletion criteria.

If you choose to recreate the article, please ensure that the material is written in your own words. If you believe that using sentences from the source is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at the talk page of the new article and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License, or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page of the new article with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the talk page of the article.

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Moonriddengirl 21:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Snapwrap.jpg

I have tagged Image:Snapwrap.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 13:39, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Weirdgamescreen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Weirdgamescreen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jeremyglickinterview.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeremyglickinterview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trailblazesymbols.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Trailblazesymbols.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NASAExtrasolarFlash.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NASAExtrasolarFlash.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Survallstarlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Survallstarlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Skittlesgum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Skittlesgum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Stage 1 Pokemon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stage 1 Pokemon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stage 1 Pokemon is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stage 1 Pokemon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LibSciCenLogo.jpg

I have tagged Image:LibSciCenLogo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Knoblogo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Knoblogo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Newmanownlimeade.jpg

I have tagged Image:Newmanownlimeade.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ArtistimpressionHobIsl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ArtistimpressionHobIsl.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:03, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Michael Skupin

I have nominated Michael Skupin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Skupin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ApprenticeFan (talk) 02:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cruisin USA

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cruisin USA, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruisin USA. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 23:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bouncemushroomglitch.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Bouncemushroomglitch.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Bouncemushroomglitch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bouncemushroomglitch.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Survallstarlogo.jpg)

You've uploaded File:Survallstarlogo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Latitude0116. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

RfD nomination of Warp pipe (disambiguation)

Proposed deletion of Lists of Nintendo characters

The article Lists of Nintendo characters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is already, and would work better as, a category. This "list of lists" is not necessary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Latitude0116! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Brad Blum - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hudson County

We started (pretty recently) putting together a task force for Hudson County related articles here. We could use help in these early stages! - Theornamentalist (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Midatlanticmap.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Midatlanticmap.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357 ^talk 22:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Survivorwinners

Template:Survivorwinners has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:49, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Intborderstates.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Intborderstates.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:LongIsland.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:LongIsland.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Donald Davis (athlete)

The article Donald Davis (athlete) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 14:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:LibstateparkNASA2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LibstateparkNASA2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 20:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:CentralParkNASA.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:CentralParkNASA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sandyhook.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Sandyhook.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Abagofpendutchcandy.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abagofpendutchcandy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g ^{Hi!- I am... -What I do...} _{WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC} 17:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pennsylvania Dutch Candies

The article Pennsylvania Dutch Candies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CORP. Company is not subject to non-trivial secondary coverage from reliable sources to assert notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — ξ ^xplicit 00:45, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pennsylvania Dutch Candies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pennsylvania Dutch Candies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania Dutch Candies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ξ ^xplicit 00:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CentralUnitedStates.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CentralUnitedStates.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:26, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:50, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Latitude0116 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked for the following reason: Keeping me blocked is no longer necessary because I would like to return to editing articles which are less controversial (such as articles about geography) Since I was blocked more than 6 months ago, I have read many Wikipedia policy pages (pages which I had not read when I started editing) and realize that it is not worth it to edit controversial articles. If I am unblocked I would like a clean start, with only one account, in order to increase reliability and stop being accused of sock puppetry, per the following line: It may be better to continue using the old account, clean up your behavior, and rebuild your reputation the hard way… [contentious articles] should be completely avoided by the editor attempting a clean start. The following is not part of my unblock request, but is related: I would like someone to stop User:Someone963852's disruptive behavior. He has been accusing innocent users (such as User: Female bodybuilder enthusiast and User: CentrumZero) of being sock puppets of me, which is not true -- these users have nothing to do with me. I believe User:Someone963852 has violated WP:HOUNDING (even though he has been hounding other users such as CentrumZero), and he has also violated WP:DBQ. His user account now seems to be used only to accuse people of being sock puppets, and not for anything constructive. If I am unblocked, I do not want be hounded by Someone963852 any longer (meaning that I do not want to be constantly accused of being random people who have nothing to do with me). Like I said, consider this paragraph as NOT part of my unblock request -- I added it only because my talk page is the only place I am currently allowed to edit. I would've added this paragraph to Mediation, but like I said I cannot edit anything except my talk page.

Decline reason:

Someone963852 is not the cause of your troubles. Your socks have been verified through multiple lines of evidence by outside parties. Danger ^{High voltage!} 18:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Latitude0116. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 11:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:STS068-258-80 Sydney.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:STS068-258-80 Sydney.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:MounteverestNASA.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MounteverestNASA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shwgunkmap.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Shwgunkmap.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Optillusionsci.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Optillusionsci.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Latitude0116 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for years and would like to begin editing again. Accusations made against me are false and have been made on anecdotal "evidence". I am NOT User:GayTenn; this person has nothing to do with me. In addition, the hounding by User:Someone963852 continues -- he just made more false accusations against my account, and I'm tired of it. I have been accused of being multiple users who have nothing to do with me. I do not have sock-puppets and would like to begin editing again. My previous unblock request was denied because of alleged "evidence" that I have sock-puppets -- again, this "evidence" is false because I do not have sock-puppets. I am hoping that a reasonable administrator will listen to me on this issue, as I was a productive editor prior to 2012 -- in 2012 (when all these accusations started being made) there was no way for me to fight them off because everyone assumed I was a "sockpuppet creator" and when I denied the accusations made against me, no one believed me. As a result, this has severely negatively impacted my experience on Wikipedia. It is terrible to be accused of being person(s) who you know are not you, and then to have people "confirm" these "hunches" based on flimsy anecdotal "evidence". Also, I have not made any edits to Wikipedia since late 2012 -- the various users I have been accused of being (such as User:GayTenn) are not me. It is frustrating to be doing proper etiquette (not edit during duration of block [even if block is wrongly used]) and then to have unjust false accusations made in the process of that etiquette.

Decline reason:

The standard offer is available to you, when you can stop socking, which your still doing. Information available to check users confirms that GayTenn, and 2 other accounts were previously used alongside other socks already in the archive of the SPI. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 16:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anecdotal evidence including behavior and a "technically indistinguishable" checkuser? I'd say that's pretty strong evidence. Origamite^{$·_·$(/·_·)/} 11:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No checkuser was used for GayTenn as well as multiple other users I've been accused of being. The one checkuser done in late 2012 was untrue (in spite of the "technically indistinguishable" claim made by an administrator). It baffles me how some Wikipedia users are able to get away with such dishonesty. Latitude0116 (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No checkuser was used because behavioral evidence was enough. Three checkusers were done by @AGK:, @DeltaQuad: and @WilliamH: to tie the accused users to the others in the then-current investigation, and behavioral evidence was used to tie the accounts to you since your information was stale in the second two. @Someone963852: just reports what you do, because they keep an eye on the areas that your puppets typically edit. Origamite^{$·_·$(/·_·)/} 12:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, (in response to DQ), I am not in any way associated with GayTenn. How am I supposed to undergo the standard offer when (within that time-frame) I keep getting accused of being people who I'm not? Five months will go by, and then five months from now Someone963852 will make a new accusation against me (accusing me of being yet another random editor whose edits vaguely resemble my own). This needs to stop: I am willing (and I have been) undergoing the standard offer (i.e. not editing, socking, etc.), but while I have been doing this, Someone963852 (which has almost become a single-purpose account to stalk me) falsely accuses me of being people who I'm not and then administrators buy into his paranoia.

I will continue (as I have been) not editing Wikipedia, but my efforts keep being sabotaged because anyone who even remotely resembles my editing habits will be viewed by Someone963852 as a sock of me (which isn't true) and then admins will agree with him based on hunches and assumptions -- and then rashly block legitimate users who are not me. Remember WP:DBQ.

As I said, I am not GayTenn, FemaleBodybuilder, and other random people I've been accused of being.

Even if I am eventually unblocked, I fear that paranoid Someone963852 will continue to stalk me and falsely accuse me of having socks (i.e. legitimate users who might resemble me but are actually other people). A user might resemble my editing habits, Someone963852 will say "that's a sock of Latitude" and an administrator will swiftly re-block me and block the unrelated person (based on the assumption that the unrelated person is one of my "socks", even though the alleged "sock" is actually an unrelated person). I somehow have to find away to overcome Someone963852's borderline harassment. Latitude0116 (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yodels2.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yodels2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Mww113 (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winterfresh5.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Winterfresh5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:SM64glitch.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SM64glitch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 17:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sharktrlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sharktrlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Physicalmapdots.jpg

The file File:Physicalmapdots.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Northernstatemap.jpg

The file File:Northernstatemap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mid atlanticmap.jpg

The file File:Mid atlanticmap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NewEnglandmap.jpg

The file File:NewEnglandmap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SoutheasternUnitedStates.jpg

The file File:SoutheasternUnitedStates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SouthwestUnitedStates.jpg

The file File:SouthwestUnitedStates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MidwestUnitedStates.jpg

The file File:MidwestUnitedStates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NorthernUnitedStates.jpg

The file File:NorthernUnitedStates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:NorthwestUnitedStates.jpg

The file File:NorthwestUnitedStates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SouthernUnitedStates.jpg

The file File:SouthernUnitedStates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Cianwood City (Cianwood Island)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cianwood City (Cianwood Island). Since you had some involvement with the Cianwood City (Cianwood Island) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Super Mario 64 Glitches" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Super Mario 64 Glitches. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 29#Super Mario 64 Glitches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fourth Connecticut Lake Trail for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fourth Connecticut Lake Trail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fourth Connecticut Lake Trail until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Beeblebrox (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Optillusionsci.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Optillusionsci.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. House Blaster^talk 13:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RandolphNHsign.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RandolphNHsign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ExtremeUS2.jpg

The file File:ExtremeUS2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bungee ball

The article Bungee ball has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lists of Nintendo characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of Nintendo characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Nintendo characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kung Fu Man (talk) 11:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]