Talk:Sukerchakia Misl

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Sikhism

This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Untitled

The Sikh Misls were an important part of Punjabs history especially considering that the Sukerchakia Misl was the Misl from which the Maharaja of Punjab came from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.38.139 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 26 August 2004 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sukerchakia Misl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150626120848/http://m.friendfeed-media.com/6e9ec7f58014456d2d5fd015cc8af9d2974509c0 to http://m.friendfeed-media.com/6e9ec7f58014456d2d5fd015cc8af9d2974509c0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About their construction

The buildings and their tombs 47.9.76.157 (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dispute

There's a dispute regarding Maharaja Ranjit Singh's ancestors, specifically about Buddha Singh being the only famous ancestor, who is claimed to be a Sansi Jatt, not Warraich, according to reliable sources. To resolve this, we seek opinions from others. We request comments on the reliability of sources for Maharaja Ranjit Singh's family origin, specifically the Family Origin and Sukerchak Village sections. Should we remove these sections due to lack of reliable sources? Please provide credible sources to clarify this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jassu712 (talk • contribs) 14:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jassu712 - Why are the current sources not reliable? It is supported by multiple sources. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 14:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but they are not reliable not even a single source is from reputable author Jassu712 (talk) 14:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Budha Singh is the first ancestor of the Sukerchakia family who had associations with Sikhism not his father he accepted Sikhism for washed away his sin not to fulfill his father wish according to reliable sources book from Hari ram Gupta Kushwant Singh and genda Singh Jassu712 (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i can provide you even Page number of different Book from reputable author's which soldfy my claim Jassu712 (talk) 14:29, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it seem you are the only one who solitary defacing the issue of uncertain objection, but still i don't feel anything until and unless you want to contribute legitimately and considerate the neutral fact from both side of opposition, and I have refine some extra insertion to clear the misconception between two of us thank and regard Our Panjāb (talk) 18:02, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Our Panjāb i guess Yes let's solve this now let's Just remove warraich jatt part instead of whole section since it's very disputed which caste Maharaja Ranjit Singh belong Jassu712 (talk) 18:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Our Panjāb read Hari Ram Gupta Book The Sikh Comrnonwealth or Rise and FalI of Sikh Misls page number 294 mentioned Buddha Singh is sansi Jatt and he adopted Sikhism to washed away his sin Jassu712 (talk) 18:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Our Panjāb if you can provide reliable source from any respectable author with page number i will back down since i already done my research Jassu712 (talk) 18:24, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to say but you done nothing extraordinary, the research paper me and that @MaplesyrupSushi dude put effortful attribution are much more attentive and broadly cover the spectrum of whole sukerchakia family and for your kind information just examine the book doesn't change the contraction and diversity of statement and furthermore i want to conclude Khuswant singh and some of other notable sikh historian are not bad but on some greater extend

but it phenomenally need more leverage and diverse composition to prevent the narrow minded approach to boost a reckless entitlement

Our Panjāb (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: To be honest do you really thinks a authenticity only can labeled by khuswant singh, are rest of all biased i dont thinks so, thats where you lacking otherwise everything is ok an to the point 2402:8100:2B87:FE05:D8D3:E098:B855:7D78 (talk) 18:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tampering with talk pages

One participant in the discussion above removed it.

If you're a participant in a talk page discussion, you should not remove the discussion or any part of it. (Normally, nobody else should remove it either. See Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.) -- Hoary (talk) 22:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]